🔗 Share this article

The UN Security Council has adopted a American-supported measure that favors Morocco's position regarding the disputed territory, despite strong opposition from Algeria.

Divided Decision Bolsters Moroccan Position

While the recent vote was divided, the measure constitutes the most significant support yet for Morocco's proposal to retain sovereignty over the region, which additionally has support from most European Union members and a growing number of African nation partners.

Measure Framework and Key Components

The document describes Moroccan plan as a foundation for negotiation. Similar to earlier measures, the text makes no mention of a vote on self-determination that contains sovereignty as an choice, which represents the approach long favored by the independence-seeking Polisario movement and its supporters.

Real autonomy under Moroccan authority could represent a most practical resolution.

Background Context

The territory is a phosphate-rich stretch of coastal desert the area of a US state which was under Spain's control until the mid-1970s. It is asserted by both the Moroccan government and the Polisario Front, which operates from refugee camps in southwestern neighboring Algeria and asserts to speak for the Sahrawi people native to the disputed territory.

Decision Patterns and International Responses

The US, which proposed the measure, led 11 countries in voting in support, while 3 countries – multiple nations – abstained. The neighboring country, the movement's primary benefactor, did not vote.

Mike Waltz, the US representative to the United Nations, stated the vote had been "historic" and would "advance the momentum for a much-delayed peace in the region".

Amar Bendjama, the Algerian ambassador to the UN, said that while the measure was an advancement on earlier versions, it "contains a series of deficiencies".

Security Operation and Upcoming Review

The resolution also extends the United Nations security mission in Western Sahara for another twelve months, as has been done for more than three decades. Previous renewals, however, have not included a reference to Morocco and its allies' preferred outcome.

The UN resolution calls on all sides participating to "seize this unprecedented chance for a lasting resolution." Depending on developments, it requests the secretary general to review the operation's mandate within half a year.

Area Consequences and Present Situation

The shift could disrupt a long-stalled situation that for many years has escaped resolution, notwithstanding a United Nations peacekeeping mission that was designed to be short-term. Protests have followed in indigenous refugee camps in the neighboring country this week, where people have pledged not to abandon their fight for self-determination.

The Moroccan government controls almost all of the territory, excluding a thin strip called the "free zone" that lies to the east of a constructed by Morocco barrier.

Historical Context and Recent Developments

A 1991 ceasefire was intended to facilitate a vote on self-determination, but disagreements over participation criteria prevented it from taking place.

Through time, the Moroccan government has developed the contested territory, constructing a deepwater port and a 656-mile highway. Government support keep food and energy costs low, and the population has grown significantly as Moroccans settle in urban areas such as major settlements.

The movement withdrew from the ceasefire in 2020 after clashes near a road the government was paving to Mauritania.

The group has since frequently documented military operations, while Morocco has primarily denied active fighting. The UN calls it "low-level tensions".

Global Relations and Future Prospects

In response to the proposed measure, Polisario stated that it would not participate in any initiative aiming "to 'legitimise' Morocco's illegal military occupation," adding resolution "cannot happen by supporting expansionism".

The situation represents the driving force in north African diplomacy. Morocco views support for its proposal as a benchmark for how it assesses its international partners.

Last October, the UN envoy suggested partitioning Western Sahara, a proposal neither side agreed to. He encouraged the government to clarify what autonomy would involve and cautioned that a absence of progress might question the UN's role and "if there remains opportunity and readiness for us to remain useful."

The initiative to reassess the UN operation comes as the US slashes financial support for United Nations initiatives and organizations, covering security operations.