🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."